Patriotic Wisdom
Topics important to Conservative Americans.

Patriotic Wisdom

No Fly Zone.

Posted on October 16th, 2009 by Tim Wisdom

Is America turning into a no fly zone?

flag_waving I’m not talking airplanes or helicopters here. This is about flying Old Glory, the Stars and Stripes, the greatest symbol of freedom in the world.

It seems like there are more and more reports in the media of bans on flying the American flag within our borders. Claims that someone might be offended by seeing Old Glory appear to be proliferating. To quote John McEnroe, “YOU CAN NOT BE SERIOUS!”.

Can you imagine going to Great Britain and being offended at seeing the Union Jack waving? How about visiting Japan and being offended at seeing the Nisshōki hanging from a building? I can’t imagine being offended by seeing the flag of any country on display within that countries borders. Not even countries that may pose a risk to our security like North Korea or Iran.

Anyone that might be offended at seeing the Stars and Stripes being publicly displayed should be investigated as a potential threat to this country. Disdain, even hatred of a particular country, is sometimes understandable. But that begs the question, if you hate a country that much, why would you visit or live there? Do you intend to cause harm or general mayhem in that country?

All over America there are people and places that ban the displaying of Old Glory, sometimes in any form. No flags in front of your home or business, no flag decal on your car, no signs depicting the flag. This is absolutely ludicrous in my view. Those bans should be ruled illegal and anyone trying to enforce such a ban should be arrested.

If someone feels offended by seeing the American flag, get out of our country! If you’re a guest here, legally or not, you should be deported and banned from ever re-entering our borders. If you have American citizenship, you should renounce it and leave. If you won’t do it voluntarily, it should be revoked and you should be ejected.

Don’t think this is a free speech issue, it isn’t. Free speech allows you to express yourself in many ways, it doesn’t allow you to hate seeing the symbol of the nation you’re in. To be offended by such a symbol you must first feel hatred toward it. If that’s how you feel, do yourself, and your mental health, a favor. Get out now! We happen to love our country and you’re no longer welcome here.

Tagged With:  

A new SCOTUS term and a new gun issue.

Posted on October 6th, 2009 by Tim Wisdom

guns The 1st Monday in October marks the beginning of a new term for the Supreme Court of the United States, commonly called SCOTUS. The October 2009 term includes at least one lawsuit regarding the 2nd Amendment with a second one, brought by the NRA, waiting to be granted a writ of certiorari. Both cases deal with the same issue, but each uses different reasoning. The one that has already been granted certiorari was filed by Alan Gura, who successfully argued Heller v. DC last year, and Chicago-area attorney David G. Sigale.

08-1521 MCDONALD V. CHICAGO

LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: 08-4241, 08-4243, 08-4244

QUESTIONS PRESENTED:

Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is incorporated as
against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities or Due
Process Clauses.

Rather than rehashing the details of the case I’ll direct you here to read all the pertinent information. What I want to discuss here is my view of the question presented by the case. There are two views on the subject and I believe both sides have valid points. I won’t disparage those that hold the other view, we can simply agree to disagree.

The disagreement deals with States rights, and whether SCOTUS can require that the individual States follow the 2nd Amendment because of the 14th. Don’t confuse this with an actual 10th Amendment case, it’s really a 2nd Amendment case whose decision could end up impacting States rights, and that’s a concern for many. Don’t get me wrong, I am a firm believer in the 10th Amendment and States rights, however I don’t think it applies here. Allow me to explain my reasoning.

In past cases, SCOTUS has ruled that certain parts of the Bill of Rights incorporate to the States through the 14th Amendment. The 1st and 5th Amendments are two of the better known ones. The Supreme Court has ruled that the States must allow free speech and cannot allow self-incrimination. The 2nd Amendment, however, is a bird of a different feather. Both the 1st and 5th Amendments concern rights granted by the Constitution. The 2nd Amendment concerns a right granted by our Creator and acknowledged by the Constitution. That’s a huge difference and it needs to be clearly understood.

The right to keep and bear arms stems from the concept of defense of ones self, family and property. In a land void of any laws, most believe they still would have the right to defend themselves, because the right doesn’t rise out of laws or governments. The right to keep and bear arms is no more than a method of that defense. Since the Constitution of the United States doesn’t grant the right, it can only recognize its existence. That is the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

When an entity applies for Statehood, they must create a State Constitution which is republican, and doesn’t violate the Federal Constitution. This requires individual State and local governments not infringe on inalienable rights acknowledged by the Federal Constitution, and is the real crux of what the Supreme Court needs to address.

In addition to the main question of incorporation in MCDONALD V. CHICAGO, the Supreme Court should, but probably won’t, define the word ‘infringe’. Doing so would strike down any and all laws that violate that definition and provide clarity to the Lower Courts. This would end the need for SCOTUS to hear further 2nd Amendment lawsuits.

Tagged With:  

the Obama chant mmm mmm mmm.

Posted on September 30th, 2009 by Tim Wisdom

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander! Since the liberals think we should teach children to chant about Barack Hussein Obama, I thought we should give them something worth chanting. Now, if only we could find a group of kids to make a video.

Everybody chant along! 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

Healthcare reform is just control

Trouble for both young and old.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

He’ll talk to Ahmadinejad

While ignoring both my Mom and Dad.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

He thought the White House was too small

Now it’s filled with Czars, wall to wall.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

We’re still in danger from terrorists

But the CIA can’t slap their wrists.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

To fix the poor’s financial health

He wants to redistribute wealth.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

The Town Halls and Tea Parties too

Show that we don’t share his view.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

He spends more money than we’ve had

My future’s looking pretty bad.

 

mmm mmm mmm

Barack Hussein Obama

As a President he’s not so great

Come on 2012 we can hardly wait!

 

Copyright 2009 Patriotic Wisdom. All rights reserved.

Tagged With:  

the Obama’s love of America.

Posted on September 28th, 2009 by Tim Wisdom

Some people have questioned whether Barack and Michelle Obama love America. I think those people are misguided because they don’t understand how the Obama’s could say what they say and do what they do if they loved this country. I hope this post helps them to see what they’re missing while showing how the Obama’s love America.

The video clips have been played over and over again and I’m not going to link to them here. If you haven’t seen them you must have been in a very long coma. Video of Michelle saying “America is a mean country” and, on 02/18/08, her two “proud of my country” speeches. The first, in Milwaukee, WI was

“for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country, because it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.”

Then, in Madison, WI

“Let me tell you something. For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country, and not just because Barack has done well, but because I think people are hungry for change”.

Don’t confuse pride with love, I’ll explain how the lack of pride can co-exist with love shortly but first, let’s look at some of Barack’s statements.

September 2001 Chicago public radio program:

“Barack Obama, what are your thoughts on the Declaration and Constitution?”

“I-I-I think it’s a remarkable document –“ he began haltingly.

“Which one?” Helfrich interjected.

“The original Constitution as well as the Civil War Amendments,” he replied. “But I think it is an imperfect document, and I think it is a document that reflects some deep flaws in American culture, the Colonial culture nascent at that time.

I don’t think the two views are contradictory, to say that it was a remarkable political document that paved the way for where we are now, and to say that it also reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day.”

During that same radio program:

But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society.

It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, …

And that hasn’t shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that.

During his European tour in 2009:

“I would like to think that with my election, we’re starting to see some restoration of America’s standing in the world.”

“There have been times when America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive”

“The United States is still working through some of our own darker periods in our history.”

“I’m grateful that President [Daniel] Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old,” (referring to JFK’s Bay of Pigs actions)

To Joe Wurzelbacher, October, 2008:

“It’s not that I want to punish your success; I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you that they’ve got a chance at success, too. I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”

During various other speeches:

“Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans.”

“It’s not surprising, then, they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

“In America, there’s a failure to appreciate Europe’s leading role in the world.”

“We have sought — in word and deed — a new era of engagement with the world. Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.”

“When you question the cause or character of my country, think about the concrete actions of the last nine months.”

I chose those quotes to provide an overview of the way Barack and Michelle Obama see the United States, its foundation, its history, its place in the world and themselves. Several things stand out in the things they’ve said. These statements show, among other things, that they see America as a racially segregated country. That the segregation problems come from flaws in the Constitution created by the Founding Fathers and not addressed by the Supreme Court. That America is a mean country because we have not achieved what they see as “political and economic justice in society”. In their view, “political and economic justice in society” means “redistributive change” in the form of “the redistribution of wealth”. They don’t believe in the old saying “give a man a fish and he’ll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he’ll eat for life”. They believe that you shouldn’t have to learn to fish, the government should take the fruits of the fisherman’s labor to feed those not trying to learn to fish.

Most people think the above mentioned statements mean the Obama’s don’t love America, however they’re missing a very important, yet basic, point. Your view of America, and mine, is not shared by the Obama’s. The America we love is the country begun, and fought for by the Patriots of the late 1700’s, formed by the Founding Fathers through the Constitution and protected by the blood of our heroic men and women through many wars and military conflicts. Barack and Michelle Obama do not see it that way. The America they love, and believe in, does not yet exist. When Michelle spoke of how “it feels like hope is finally making a comeback” she referred to the hope of an America that can be changed to fit their progressive vision. When she said “I think people are hungry for change” she was thinking of a change to the fundamental course of the country. The new course takes us away from our “flawed” Constitutional roots and toward a new “just” society. They believe that Barack can, and will, steer us in the direction we should have been going all along. “it feels like hope is finally making a comeback.” “When you question the cause or character of my country, think about the concrete actions of the last nine months.” The Obama’s believe “Our country still struggles with the legacies of slavery and segregation, the past treatment of Native Americans” and they can change that.

The time has come to decide which America you will fight for. If you agree with the Obama’s, then fight to elect progressive liberals that agree with you. If you believe, as I do, that America needs to return to the values of the Constitution, allowing all to achieve by their own labors, then fight to elect the representatives that share those ideals. Either way, it’s time to stand up and be counted.

Tea Party Express rolls again!

Posted on September 24th, 2009 by Tim Wisdom

The Tea Party Express is preparing to take to the road again. Beginning on October 25th the bus that became famous for its trip across America, culminating on 9/12 in Washington, D.C., will start rolling again. A new route and destination are planned this time. The new nationwide trip will wind up with a rally in Orlando, FL on November 11th, Veterans Day. Billed as “Tea Party Express: Countdown to Judgment Day”, it will serve as a reminder of the upcoming elections in 2010.

Election Day in 2010 is being referred to as “Judgment Day” by many Americans that have become disgruntled by the lack of responsiveness by their elected officials. Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike have voiced their displeasure at the dismissive attitudes of those they sent to Washington to represent them. Adding fuel to that fire are the divisive comments made by Congressional leaders. Epithet’s like brown shirts, Astroturf, Nazi’s and teabaggers have been used against Patriotic Americans simply because they’re concerned about the direction in which America is being taken.

Get the full story on the “Tea Party Express: Countdown to Judgment Day”,  here.